State to join fight over EPA rulingGreenhouse gas decision stymies vehicle emissions legislationMaryland leaders Thursday vowed to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to reject a state’s ability to regulate the greenhouse gases emitted by automobiles. ‘‘We feel like the EPA doesn’t have the authority to decline the waiver,” said Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler. ‘‘If our legislature spoke about wanting to reduce our carbon footprint and lowering greenhouse gas emissions, then we ought to be able to do that.” On Wednesday, EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson denied California’s petition to adopt its own guidelines to regulate carbon dioxide, the chief gas that causes global warming. The ruling prevents 17 other states, including Maryland, from enacting their own regulations. The 18 states account for almost 50 percent of the total U.S. population and about 45 percent of new automobile sales nationwide. Maryland became the 11th state to adopt California-style emissions standards on new vehicles with passage of the ‘‘Clean Cars” bill during the 2007 legislative session. Maryland’s law would begin with cars sold in 2011, and would require them to be more fuel-efficient and produce fewer carbon dioxide emissions. ‘‘We’ve passed a bill and the EPA is blocking the enactment of that bill,” said Del. Maggie L. McIntosh (D-Dist.43) of Baltimore, chairwoman of the House Environmental Matters Committee. ‘‘What are you going to do? We have to have the cooperation of the EPA. It’s a sad state of affairs.” In a statement Thursday, Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) and Gansler (D) said they would pursue every legal option available to ensure enactment of Maryland’s law. If California and other states take the EPA to court, Gansler’s office would handle Maryland’s involvement. In blocking California’s petition, the EPA said a national approach to combating global warming from greenhouse emissions is better than a state-by-state approach. President Bush agreed, in a statement defending Johnson’s ruling. At the same time, Bush (R) signed a comprehensive congressional bill increasing fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. ‘‘While new federal standards on auto emissions are a positive step, the Bush Administration should not prevent states from making even more progress where the federal government has failed to act for so long,” the O’Malley-Gansler statement said. U.S. Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin said the ruling was ‘‘consistent with [the Bush administration’s] policy on the energy and environment front.” ‘‘Here you have states trying to do what federalism is all about. I thought it was a horrible decision and it was unprecedented and wrong,” said Cardin (D) of Pikesville. Environmentalists have criticized the Bush administration, including its attempts to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling. Across the state, environmentalists were also dismayed by the EPA’s ruling. Michael Replogle, transportation director with Environmental Defense, called the ruling ‘‘outrageous.” ‘‘This sends a horrible signal that the administration has done this. They’re signing legislation on one hand and on the other are striking down this legislation,” said Cindy Schwartz, executive director of the Maryland League of Conservation Voters. ‘‘It’s disheartening when states are working this hard to do the right thing ... but that’s why we have elections and hopefully there will be a change.” But car dealer Jack Fitzgerald said the states’ hard work has actually paid off. ‘‘California went in the direction they went in because the federal government had refused to act. I think what California and all those other states have done is force the government to move, and they’ve done it,” said Fitzgerald, president of Fitzgerald Auto Malls, headquartered in Kensington. ‘‘I think California and Maryland have gotten what they want whether they realize it or not.” Fitzgerald and other state auto dealers have argued that environmental standards for automobiles should be handled nationally, as the Bush administration has determined. ‘‘Our biggest concern was not the emissions piece, because vehicles that are being built now are as clean as they are going to get and are getting cleaner,” said J. Peter Kitzmiller, president of the Maryland Automobile Dealers Association. ‘‘Our concern was that states were going to set their own standards, and to have 15 or so different rules was not acceptable.” ‘‘The idea that the impact of greenhouse gases is something confined to the state of Maryland is silly,” Kitzmiller said. ‘‘This is a global issue. But we know the story is not over and there will be some litigation.” Staff Writer Douglas Tallman contributed to this report.
|
Top Jobs
Loading...
Weekly SpecialsLoading...
Resources |