Maryland Community Newspapers Online
The election is Nov. 3.
Jason Judd (D)
In the angry debate over growth and annexations, it's easy to forget what it's really all about: We're a growing city —people are moving here because Frederick's a great place to live.
As mayor, I'll speak up strongly and clearly for the city's interests to maintain that quality of life. I'll work to make sure that all our residents — old and new — have good places to live, work, play, build businesses, and more by going after development that fits our vision for sustainable growth here over the next 30-50 years, and deals that are good for our quality of life, our economy, and our environment.
I commit to well-planned growth that doesn't depend on lots of tax dollars; looking after older neighborhoods, and getting serious about infill and redevelopment; capitalizing on federal investment incentives like the New Market tax credits; independent cost-benefit analysis of development deals; and no shortcuts on the public process, including letting voters have a say.
For annexations that are going forward, we'll set the standard for sustainable development. If city voters end up sending a deal back to the drawing board, we'll work for a better deal.
Randy McClement (R)
The city followed proper process in both negotiating and approving the annexations. We should be asking the property owners why they wanted to be part of the city and not simply develop their property in the county.
The city did not go outside of the county's growth plan in any of these annexations, so I am not sure why the county has taken such a hard stance on this matter. Based on all economic and building factors for Frederick, at best the project will not be done for another 10-15 years. In the mean time, the city will benefit from the annexation by collecting property tax (all be it at the lower agricultural rate).
Four years ago, the city paid the county $51 million to construct a water pipeline and expand the New Design water treatment plant. Why did they sign that agreement if they had no intention of allowing the use of that water for development?
I would like to comment on the referendum. I think the process needs to be respected, all the way around. Some opponents think the incumbents are afraid of a referendum, I don't see anything to be afraid of by people voting.